Quasipotential approximation

The general form of the BSE for the scattering amplitude is in a from

M(k1k2,k1k2;P)=V(k1k2,k1k2;P)+d4k2(2π)4V(k1k2,k1k2;P)G(k1k2;P)M(k1k2,k1k2;P),\begin{align} {\cal M}(k'_1k'_2,k_1k_2;P)&={\cal V}(k'_1k'_2,k_1k_2;P)+\int\frac{d^4 k''_2}{(2\pi)^4} {\cal V}(k'_1k'_2,k''_1k''_2;P)G(k''_1k''_2;P){\cal M}(k''_1k''_2,k_1k_2;P),\quad \end{align}

where V{\cal V} is the potential kernel and GG is the propagators for two constituent particles. Here the momentum of the system P=k1+k2=k1+k2=k1+k2P=k_1+k_2=k'_1+k'_2=k''_1+k''_2. It can be abbreviated as

M=V+VGM.\begin{align} {\cal M}&={\cal V}+{\cal V}{G}{\cal M}. \end{align}

The Gross form of proposed quasipotential propagators for particles 1 and 2 with mass m1m_1 and m2m_2 written down in the center of mass frame where P=(W,0)P=(W,{\bm 0}) with particle 2 being on shell are

g=2πiδ+(k22m22)k12m12=2πiδ(k20E2)2E2[(WE2)2E12],\begin{align} g=2\pi i\frac{\delta^+(k_2^2-m_2^2)}{k_1^2-m_1^2}=2\pi i\frac{\delta(k^0_2-E_2)}{2E_2[(W-E_2)^2-E_1^2]}, \end{align}

where k1=(k10,k)=(E1,k)k_1=(k_1^0,\bm k)=(E_1,\bm k), k2=(k20,k)=(WE1,k)k_2=(k_2^0,-\bm k)=(W-E_1,-\bm k) with E1=m12+k2E_1=\sqrt{m_1^2+|\bm k|^2}.

With the define of G0=g/(2πi)G_0=g/(2\pi i), the four-dimensional BSE can be reduced to a three-dimensional equation in center of mass frame

iM(k,k)=iV(k,k)+dk(2π)3iV(k,k)G0(k)iM(k,k),\begin{align} i{\cal M}({\bm k}',{\bm k})&=i{\cal V}({\bm k}',{\bm k})+\int\frac{d {\bm k}''}{(2\pi)^3} i{\cal V}({\bm k}',{\bm k}'')G_0({\bm k}'')i{\cal M}({\bm k}'',{\bm k}),\quad \end{align}

Note: the iMi{\cal M} and iVi{\cal V} are usually real. In the center of mass frame. We choose k2=k{\bm k}_2={\bm k} and k1=k{\bm k}_1=-{\bm k}.

Partial-wave expansion

To reduce the equation to one-dimensional equation, we apply the partial wave expansion,

Vλλ(k,k)=JλR2J+14πDλR,λJ(ϕ,θ,ϕ)Vλλ,λRJ(k,k)DλR,λJ(ϕ,θ,ϕ)Vλλ,λRJ(k,k)=2J+14πdΩdΩDλR,λJ(ϕ,θ,ϕ)Vλλ(k,k)DλR,λJ(ϕ,θ,ϕ)VλλJ(k,k)=2πdcosθk,kdλ,λJ(θk,k)Vλλ(k,k)\begin{align} &{\cal V}_{\lambda'\lambda}({\bm k}',{\bm k})= \sum _{J\lambda_R}{\frac{2J+1}{4\pi}}D^{J*}_{\lambda_R,\lambda'}(\phi',\theta',-\phi'){\cal V}^J_{\lambda'\lambda,\lambda_R}({\rm k}',{\rm k})D^{J}_{\lambda_R,\lambda}(\phi,\theta,-\phi) \nonumber\\ &\to{\cal V}_{\lambda'\lambda,\lambda_R}^J({\rm k}',{\rm k})= {\frac{2J+1}{4\pi}}\int d\Omega' d\Omega D^{J*}_{\lambda_R,\lambda'}(\phi',\theta',-\phi'){\cal V}_{\lambda'\lambda}({\bm k}',{\bm k})D^{J}_{\lambda_R,\lambda}(\phi,\theta,-\phi) \nonumber\\&\to{\cal V}_{\lambda'\lambda}^J({\rm k}',{\rm k})=2\pi\int d\cos\theta_{k,k'} d^{J}_{\lambda,\lambda'}(\theta_{k',k}) {\cal V}_{\lambda'\lambda}({\bm k}',{\bm k}) \end{align}

where the momenta are chosen as k2=(E2,0,0,k)k_2=(E_2,0,0,{\rm k}), k1=(WE2,0,0,k)k_1=(W-E_2,0,0,-{\rm k}) and k2=(E2,ksinθk,k,0,kcosθk,k)k'_2=(E'_2,{\rm k}'\sin\theta_{k,k'},0,{\rm k}'\cos\theta_{k,k'}), k=(WE2,ksinθk,k,0,kcosθk,k)k=(W-E_2,-{\rm k}'\sin\theta_{k,k'},0,-{\rm k}'\cos\theta_{k,k'}) with k=k{\rm k}=|{\bm k}| and k=k{\rm k}'=|{\bm k}'|. NOTE: Which particle is chosen to parallel to zz axis is related to the order of λ\lambda and λ\lambda' in dλλJ(θk,k)d^{J}_{\lambda'\lambda}(\theta_{k,k'}), so it can not be chosen arbitrarily. And the definition of helicity is also dependent of the definition of k1,2{\bm k}_{1,2}. Here, λ=λ2λ1\lambda=\lambda_2-\lambda_1 and λ1=s1\lambda_1=-s_1, λ2=s2\lambda_2=s_2. The scattering amplitudes M{\cal M} has analogous relations.

Now we have the partial wave BS equation,

iMλ,λJ(k,k)=2J+14πdΩdΩDλR,λJ(ϕ,θ,ϕ)DλR,λJ(ϕ,θ,ϕ)[iVλλ(k,k)+dk(2π)3iVλλ(k,k)G0(k)iMλλ(k,k)]=iVλλJ(k,k)+k2dk(2π)3iVλλJ(k,k)G0(k)iMλλJ(k,k)\begin{align} i{\cal M}^J_{\lambda',\lambda}({\rm k}',{\rm k})&= {\frac{2J+1}{4\pi}}\int d\Omega' d\Omega D^{J*}_{\lambda_R,\lambda'}(\phi',\theta',-\phi')D^{J}_{\lambda_R,\lambda}(\phi,\theta,-\phi)\nonumber\\ &\cdot\left[i{\cal V}_{\lambda'\lambda}({\bm k}',{\bm k})+\int\frac{d{\bm k}''}{(2\pi)^3}i{\cal V}_{\lambda'\lambda''}({\bm k}',{\bm k}'') G_0({\bm k}'')i{\cal M}_{\lambda''\lambda}({\bm k}'',{\bm k})\right]\nonumber\\ &=i{\cal V}^J_{\lambda'\lambda}({\rm k}',{\rm k})+\int\frac{{\rm k}''^2d{\rm k}''}{(2\pi)^3}i{\cal V}^J_{\lambda'\lambda''}({\rm k}',{\rm k}'') G_0({\bm k}'')i{\cal M}^J_{\lambda''\lambda}({\rm k}'',{\rm k}) \end{align}

where dΩDλ1,λ2J(ϕ,θ,ϕ)Dλ1,λ2J(ϕ,θ,ϕ)=4π2J+1\int d\Omega D^{J*}_{\lambda_1,\lambda_2}(\phi,\theta,-\phi)D^{J'*}_{\lambda'_1,\lambda'_2}(\phi,\theta,-\phi)={\frac{4\pi}{2J+1}} is used.

Fixed parity

For a helicity state J,λ=J,λ1λ2|J,\lambda\rangle=|J,\lambda_1\lambda_2\rangle fulfill the party property,

PJ,λ=PJ,λ1λ2=η1η2(1)Js1s2J,λ1λ2η~Jλ\begin{align} P|J,\lambda\rangle=P|J,\lambda_1\lambda_2\rangle =\eta_1\eta_2(-1)^{J-s_1-s_2}|J,-\lambda_1-\lambda_2\rangle \equiv\tilde{\eta}|J-\lambda\rangle \end{align}

The construction of normalized states with parity ±\pm is now straightforward:

J,λ;±=12(J,+λ±η~J,λPJ,λ;±=12(η~J,λ±J,+λ)=±12(±η~J,λ+J,λ)=±J,λ;±\begin{align} |J,\lambda;\pm\rangle&=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|J,+\lambda\rangle\pm\tilde{\eta} |J,-\lambda\rangle\nonumber\\ \Rightarrow P|J,\lambda;\pm\rangle&= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\tilde{\eta}|J,-\lambda\rangle\pm|J,+\lambda\rangle) =\pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\pm\tilde{\eta}|J,-\lambda\rangle+|J,\lambda\rangle) =\pm|J,\lambda;\pm\rangle \end{align}

MλλJ±=J,λ;±MJ,λ;±=MλλJ±η~MλλJ,MλλJ±=±η~MλλJ±ηMλλJ±,  MλλJ±=±η~MλλJ±ηMλλJ±\begin{align} {\cal M}^{J\pm}_{\lambda'\lambda}=\langle J,\lambda';\pm|{\cal M}|J,\lambda;\pm\rangle ={\cal M}^{J}_{\lambda'\lambda}\pm \tilde{\eta} {\cal M}^J_{\lambda'-\lambda},\quad {\cal M}^{J\pm}_{\lambda'-\lambda}=\pm\tilde{\eta} {\cal M}^{J\pm}_{\lambda'\lambda}\equiv\eta {\cal M}^{J\pm}_{\lambda'\lambda},\ \ {\cal M}^{J\pm}_{-\lambda'\lambda}=\pm\tilde{\eta}' {\cal M}^{J\pm}_{\lambda'\lambda}\equiv\eta' {\cal M}^{J\pm}_{\lambda'\lambda} \end{align}

with η=PP1P2(1)J1+J2J=P(1)1/2+J\eta=PP_1P_2(-1)^{J_1+J_2-J}=P(-1)^{1/2+J}. The potential VλλJP{\cal V}^{J^P}_{\lambda'\lambda} has analogous relations.

iMλλ=iVλλ+λiVλλGiMλλ,ηiMλλ=ηiVλλ+λiVλλGηiMλλiMλλJP=iVλλJP+λiVλλGiMλλJP,iMλλJP=iVλλJP+λiVλλGiMλλJP=iVλλJP+λiVλλGηiMλλJPiMλλJP=iVλλJP+12λiVλλJPGiMλλJP,\begin{align} & i{\cal M}_{\lambda\lambda'}=i{\cal V}_{\lambda\lambda'}+\sum_{\lambda''}i{\cal V}_{\lambda\lambda''}Gi{\cal M}_{\lambda''\lambda'},\quad \eta'i{\cal M}_{\lambda-\lambda'}=\eta'i{\cal V}_{\lambda-\lambda'}+\sum_{\lambda''}i{\cal V}_{\lambda\lambda''}G\eta'i{\cal M}_{\lambda''-\lambda'}\nonumber\\ &\Rightarrow i{\cal M}^{J^P}_{\lambda\lambda'}=i{\cal V}^{J^P}_{\lambda\lambda'}+\sum_{\lambda''}i{\cal V}_{\lambda\lambda''}Gi{\cal M}^{J^P}_{\lambda''\lambda'},\quad i{\cal M}^{J^P}_{\lambda\lambda'}=i{\cal V}^{J^P}_{\lambda\lambda'}+\sum_{\lambda''}i{\cal V}_{\lambda-\lambda''}Gi{\cal M}^{J^P}_{-\lambda''\lambda'} =iV^{J^P}_{\lambda\lambda'}+\sum_{\lambda''}i{\cal V}_{\lambda-\lambda''}G\eta''i{\cal M}^{J^P}_{-\lambda''\lambda'}\nonumber\\ &\Rightarrow i{\cal M}^{J^P}_{\lambda\lambda'}=i{\cal V}^{J^P}_{\lambda\lambda'}+\frac{1}{2}\sum_{\lambda''}i{\cal V}^{J^P}_{\lambda\lambda''}Gi{\cal M}^{J^P}_{\lambda''\lambda'}, \end{align}

As shown in Eq.~(9), the amplitudes are not independent. If we only keep the independent amplitudes, the equation for definite parity can be written as

iMijJP=iVijJP+12λiViλJPGiMλjJP=iVijJP+12iVi0JPGiM0jJP+k0iVikJPGiMkjJP,iM^ijJP=iV^ijJP+kiV^ikJPGiM^kjJP.\begin{align} &i{\cal M}^{J^P}_{ij}=i{\cal V}^{J^P}_{ij}+\frac{1}{2}\sum_{\lambda''}i{\cal V}^{J^P}_{i\lambda''}Gi{\cal M}^{J^P}_{\lambda''j} =i{\cal V}^{J^P}_{ij}+\frac{1}{2}i{\cal V}^{J^P}_{i0}Gi{\cal M}^{J^P}_{0j}+\sum_{k\neq0}i{\cal V}^{J^P}_{ik}Gi{\cal M}^{J^P}_{kj},\nonumber\\ \Rightarrow&i\hat{{\cal M}}^{J^P}_{ij}=i\hat{\cal V}^{J^P}_{ij}+\sum_{k}i\hat{\cal V}^{J^P}_{ik}Gi\hat{\cal M}^{J^P}_{kj}. \end{align}

where ii, jj, kk are the indix for the independent amplitudes and M^=fifjM\hat{\cal M}=f_if_j {\cal M} with f0=12f_0=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} and fi0=1f_{i\neq0}=1 with 00 for the amplitudes with λ1=λ2=0\lambda_1=\lambda_2=0.

The Bethe-Saltpeter equation for partial-wave amplitude with fixed spin-parity JPJ^P reads ,

iM^λλJP(p,p)=iV^λ,λJP(p,p)+λp2dp(2π)3 iV^λλJP(p,p)G0(p)iM^λλJP(p,p).\begin{align} i\hat{\cal M}^{J^P}_{\lambda'\lambda}({\rm p}',{\rm p}) &=i\hat{\cal V}^{J^P}_{\lambda',\lambda}({\rm p}',{\rm p})+\sum_{\lambda''}\int\frac{{\rm p}''^2d{\rm p}''}{(2\pi)^3}~ i\hat{\cal V}^{J^P}_{\lambda'\lambda''}({\rm p}',{\rm p}'') G_0({\rm p}'')i\hat{\cal M}^{J^P}_{\lambda''\lambda}({\rm p}'',{\rm p}). \end{align}

Note that the sum extends only over nonnegative helicity λ\lambda''. The partial wave potential is defined as

iV^λλJP(p,p)=fifjiVλλJP(p,p)=fifj2πdcosθ [dλλJ(θ)iVλλ(p,p)+ηdλλJ(θ)iVλλ(p,p)],\begin{align} i\hat{\cal V}^{J^P}_{\lambda'\lambda''}({\rm p}',{\rm p}'')=f_if_j i{\cal V}_{\lambda'\lambda}^{J^P}({\rm p}',{\rm p}) &=f_if_j 2\pi\int d\cos\theta ~[d^{J}_{\lambda\lambda'}(\theta) i{\cal V}_{\lambda'\lambda}({\bm p}',{\bm p}) +\eta d^{J}_{-\lambda\lambda'}(\theta) i{\cal V}_{\lambda'-\lambda}({\bm p}',{\bm p})], \end{align}

Transformation to a matrix equation

Now We have a integral equation with singularity in G0=12E((sE)2ω2)G_0=\frac{1}{2 E((s-E)^2-\omega^2)} at W=E1+E2W=E_1+E_2. This singularity can be isolated as,

iM^JP(p,p)=iV^JP(p,p)+p2dp(2π)3iV^JP(p,p)G0(p)iM^JP(p,p)=iV^JP+Pp2dp(2π)3iV^JPG0M^JPπip2dp(2π)3V^oJPδG0M^oJP=iV^JP+dp(2π)3[p2G0iV^JPM^JPMV^oJPM^oJPp2pˉ2]ipˉ2δGˉ08π2V^oJPM^oJP=iV^JP+dp(2π)3p2G0iVJPM^JP[dp(2π)3Mp2pˉ2+ipˉ2δGˉ08π2]V^oJPM^oJP\begin{align} i\hat{\cal M}^{J^P}({\rm p}',{\rm p}) &=i\hat{\cal V}^{J^P}({\rm p},{\rm p}')+\int\frac{{\rm p}''^2d {\rm p}''}{(2\pi)^3}i\hat{\cal V}^{J^P}({\rm p},{\rm p}'') G_0({\rm p}'')i\hat{\cal M}^{J^P}({\rm p}'', {\rm p}')\nonumber\\ &=i\hat{\cal V}^{J^P}+\mathcal{P}\int\frac{{\rm p}''^2d {\rm p}''}{(2\pi)^3}i\hat{\cal V}^{J^P} G_0\hat{\cal M}^{J^P}-\pi i\int\frac{{\rm p}''^2d {\rm p}''}{(2\pi)^3}\hat{\cal V}^{J^P}_o\delta G_0\hat{\cal M}^{J^P}_o\nonumber\\ &=i\hat{\cal V}^{J^P}+\int\frac{d {\rm p}''}{(2\pi)^3}\left[{\rm p}''^2 G_0 i\hat{\cal V}^{J^P} \hat{\cal M}^{J^P}-\frac{M\hat{\cal V}^{J^P}_o\hat{\cal M}^{J^P}_o}{{\rm p}''^2-\bar{{\rm p}''}^2}\right] -i\frac{\bar{{\rm p}''}^2\delta\bar{G}_0}{8\pi^2}\hat{\cal V}^{J^P}_o\hat{\cal M}^{J^P}_o\nonumber\\ &=i\hat{\cal V}^{J^P}+\int\frac{d {\rm p}''}{(2\pi)^3}{\rm p}''^2 G_0 i{\cal V}^{J^P} \hat{\cal M}^{J^P} -[\int\frac{d {\rm p}''}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{M}{{\rm p}''^2-\bar{{\rm p}''}^2}+i\frac{\bar{{\rm p}''}^2\delta\bar{G}_0}{8\pi^2}]\hat{\cal V}^{J^P}_o\hat{\cal M}^{J^P}_o\nonumber\\ \end{align}

with δG0=δ(sEω))2E(sE+ω)θ(sm1m2)=δGˉ0δ(ppˉ)=14Wpˉδ(ppˉ)θ(sm1m2)\delta G_0=\frac{\delta(s-E-\omega))}{2E(s-E+\omega)}\theta(s-m_1-m_2)=\delta \bar{G}_0\delta({\rm p}''-\bar{{\rm p}''})=\frac{1}{4W\bar{{\rm p}''}}\delta({\rm p}''-\bar{{\rm p}''})\theta(s-m_1-m_2), M=[p2(p2pˉ2)G0]ppˉθ(sm1m2)=pˉ22Wθ(sm1m2)M=[{\rm p}''^2({\rm p}''^2-\bar{{\rm p}''}^2)G_0]_{{\rm p}''\to\bar{{\rm p}''}}\theta(s-m_1-m_2)=-\frac{\bar{{\rm p}''}^2}{2W}\theta(s-m_1-m_2).

We have

Im G=ρ/2=pˉ32π2W.\begin{align} Im~G=-\rho/2=-\frac{\bar{{\rm p}''}}{32\pi^2 W}. \end{align}

It suggests the unitary is satisfied if the potential iVi{\cal V} is real.

TρT=2T ImG T=2T(ImT1)T=2T12i(T1T1)T=i(TT)\begin{align} -T^\dag \rho T=2 T^\dag~ ImG~T=2T^\dag(-Im T^{-1})T=2T^\dag\frac{1}{2i}(T^{\dag-1}- T^{-1})T=i(T-T^\dag) \end{align}

where T=iMT=i{\cal M}.

With the Gauss discretization, the one-dimensional equation can be transformed as a matrix equation as

iM^ikJP=iV^ikJP+j=0NiV^ijJPGjiM^jkJPM^JP=V^JP+V^JPGM^JP\begin{align} i\hat{\cal M}^{J^P}_{ik} &=&i\hat{\cal V}^{J^P}_{ik}+\sum_{j=0}^N i\hat{\cal V}^{J^P}_{ij}G_ji\hat{\cal M}^{J^P}_{jk}\Rightarrow \hat{M}^{J^P}=\hat{V}^{J^P}+\hat{V}^{J^P}G\hat{M}^{J^P} \end{align}

Gj={iqˉ32π2W+j[w(qj)(2π)3qˉ22W(qj2qˉ2)]for j=0, if Re(W)>m1+m2,w(qj)(2π)3qj22E(qj)[(WE(qj))2ω2(qj)]for j0\begin{align} G_j=\left\{\begin{array}{cl}-\frac{i\bar{q}}{32\pi^2 W}+\sum_j \left[\frac{w(q_j)}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{\bar{q}^2} {2W{(q_j^2-\bar{q}^2)}}\right] & {\rm for}\ j=0,\ {\rm if}\ Re(W)>m_1+m_2,\nonumber\\ \frac{w(q_j)}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{q_j^2} {2E(q_j)[(W-E(q_j))^2-\omega^2(q_j)]}& {\rm for}\ j\neq0 \end{array}\right. \end{align}

where qˉ=12W[W2(m1+m2)2][W2(m1m2)2]\bar{q}=\frac{1}{2W}\sqrt{[W^2-(m_1+m_2)^2][W^2-(m_1-m_2)^2]}. The indices i,j,ki, j, k is for discrete momentum values, independent helicities, and coupled channels.

The default dimension is [G]=1[G] = 1. Recalling that a factor of 2m2m should be included if a constituent particle is a fermion, we have [G]=GeVnf[V]=[M]=GeVnf[G] = \text{GeV}^{n_f} \to [V] = [M] = \text{GeV}^{-n_f}, with nfn_f being the number of fermions. Therefore, under our convention where uˉu=1\bar{u}u = 1, the dimension of the potential must satisfy the above requirements. This criterion can be employed to verify the consistency of the Lagrangian and the derived potential.

Hence, for the channels above its thresholds, the matrix have an extra dimension. We take two channel as example to explain the coupled-channel equation. The region of WW is divided as W<m1W<m_{1}, m1<W<m2m_{1}<W<m_{2} and W>m2W>m_{2}.

V=(V11NNV12NNV21NNV22NN),G=(G1N00G2N),W<m1,V=(V11N+1N+1V12N+1NV21NN+1V22NN),G=(G1N+100G2N),m1<W<m2V=(V11N+1N+1V12N+1N+1V21N+1N+1V22N+1N+1),G=(G1N+100G2N+1),W>m2\begin{align} % V&=\left(\begin{array}{cc} V^{NN}_{11}&V^{NN}_{12}\\ V^{NN}_{21}&V^{NN}_{22} \end{array}\right),\quad G=\left(\begin{array}{cc} G^{N}_{1}&0\\ 0&G^{N}_{2} \end{array}\right),\quad W<m_{1},\\ % V&=\left(\begin{array}{cc} V^{N+1N+1}_{11}&V^{N+1N}_{12}\\ V^{NN+1}_{21}&V^{NN}_{22} \end{array}\right),\quad G=\left(\begin{array}{cc} G^{N+1}_{1}&0\\ 0&G^{N}_{2} \end{array}\right),\quad m_{1}<W<m_{2} \\ V&=\left(\begin{array}{cc} V^{N+1N+1}_{11}&V^{N+1N+1}_{12}\\ V^{N+1N+1}_{21}&V^{N+1N+1}_{22} \end{array}\right),\quad G=\left(\begin{array}{cc} G^{N+1}_{1}&0\\ 0&G^{N+1}_{2} \end{array}\right),\quad W>m_{2} \end{align}

Code

In code, we choose VJP=V^JP/4πV^{J^P}=\hat{V}^{J^P}/4\pi, G4πGG\to4\pi{G}, and MJP=M^JP/4πM^{J^P}=\hat{M}^{J^P}/4\pi. Hence, the qBSE becomes

MJP=VJP+VJPGMJP.\begin{align} M^{J^P}=V^{J^P}+V^{J^P}GM^{J^P}. \end{align}

Such convention is consistent with that in the chiral unitary approach.

VJP=V^JP/4π=iV^λλJP(p,p)/4π=fifjiVλλJP(p,p)/4π=12fifjdcosθ [dλλJ(θ)iVλλ(p,p)+ηdλλJ(θ)iVλλ(p,p)],\begin{align} V^{J^P}&=\hat{V}^{J^P}/4\pi=i\hat{\cal V}^{J^P}_{\lambda'\lambda''}({\rm p}',{\rm p}'')/4\pi=f_if_j i{\cal V}_{\lambda'\lambda}^{J^P}({\rm p}',{\rm p})/4\pi \nonumber\\ &=\frac{1}{2}f_if_j \int d\cos\theta ~[d^{J}_{\lambda\lambda'}(\theta) i{\cal V}_{\lambda'\lambda}({\bm p}',{\bm p}) +\eta d^{J}_{-\lambda\lambda'}(\theta) i{\cal V}_{\lambda'-\lambda}({\bm p}',{\bm p})], \end{align}

Gj={iqˉ8πW+j[w(qj)2π2qˉ22W(qj2qˉ2)]for j=0, if Re(W)>m1+m2,w(qj)2π2qj22E(qj)[(WE(qj))2ω2(qj)]for j0\begin{align} G_j=\left\{\begin{array}{cl}-\frac{i\bar{q}}{8\pi W}+\sum_j \left[\frac{w(q_j)}{2\pi^2}\frac{\bar{q}^2} {2W{(q_j^2-\bar{q}^2)}}\right] & {\rm for}\ j=0,\ {\rm if}\ Re(W)>m_1+m_2,\nonumber\\ \frac{w(q_j)}{2\pi^2}\frac{q_j^2} {2E(q_j)[(W-E(q_j))^2-\omega^2(q_j)]}& {\rm for}\ j\neq0 \end{array}\right. \end{align}

Physical observable

After extend the energy in the center of mass frame WW into complex energy plane as zz, the pole can be found by variation of zz to satisfy

1V(z)G(z)=0\begin{align} |1-V(z)G(z)|=0 \end{align}

with z=ER+iΓR/2z=E_R+i\Gamma_R/2.

With the obtained amplitude MJPM^{J^P}, we can also calculate the physical observable. Note that all physical observable are at real axis, we choose the onshell momentum as

Mij(z)={[(1VG)1]V}ij\begin{align} M_{ij}(z)=\{[(1-VG)^{-1}]V\}_{ij} \end{align}

with ii and kk chosen as the onshell momentum, that is, 00 dimension for GG, and extra dimension for VV.

The cross section for the channel considered

For the open channel, the cross section can be obtained as

dσdΩ=1j~1j~2164π2skkλλMλλ(k)2.\begin{align} \frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}=\frac{1}{\tilde{j}_1\tilde{j}_2}\frac{1}{64\pi^2 s}\frac{|{\bm k}'|}{|{\bm k}|}\sum_{\lambda\lambda'}|{\cal M}_{\lambda\lambda'}({\bm k})|^2. \end{align}

The total cross section can be written as

σ=1j~1j~2164π2skkdΩλMλλ(k)2=1j~1j~2164π2skkJ,λJ~4πMλλJ(k)2=116πskkJP,i0j0J~j~1j~2M^ijJP(k)4π2=116πskkJP,i0j0J~j~1j~2MijJP2.\begin{align} \sigma&=\frac{1}{\tilde{j}_1\tilde{j}_2}\frac{1}{64\pi^2 s}\frac{|{\bm k}'|}{|{\bm k}|}\int d\Omega\sum_{\lambda}|{\cal M}_{\lambda\lambda'}(|{\bm k}|)|^2 =\frac{1}{\tilde{j}_1\tilde{j}_2}\frac{1}{64\pi^2 s}\frac{|{\bm k}'|}{|{\bm k}|}\sum_{J,\lambda}\frac{\tilde{J}}{4\pi}|{\cal M}^J_{\lambda\lambda'}(|{\bm k}|)|^2\nonumber\\ &=\frac{1}{16\pi s}\frac{|{\bm k}'|}{|{\bm k}|}\sum_{J^P,i\geq0 j\geq0}\frac{\tilde{J}}{\tilde{j}_1\tilde{j}_2}\left|\frac{\hat{{\cal M}}^{J^P}_{ij}(|{\bm k}|)}{4\pi}\right|^2 =\frac{1}{16\pi s}\frac{|{\bm k}'|}{|{\bm k}|}\sum_{J^P,i\geq0 j\geq0}\frac{\tilde{J}}{\tilde{j}_1\tilde{j}_2}\left|M_{ij}^{J^P}\right|^2. \end{align}

NOTE: 4MM4MM' should be multiplied if convention uˉu=1\bar{u}u=1 adopted.

σJ,λλMλλJ2=J,λj=0MλjJ2+J,λj>0[MλjJ2+MλjJ2]=JP,λj=0δη,112MλjJP2+J,λj>0[14MλjJ++MλjJ2+14MλjJ+MλjJ2]=JP,i=0j=0δη,1δη,112MijJP2+JP,i>0j=02δη,112MijJP2+JP,λj>012MλjJP2=JP,i=0j=0δη,1δη,112MijJP2+JP,i>0j=0δη,112MijJP2+JP,i=0j>0δη,112MijJP2+JP,i>0j>0MλjJP2=JP,i=0j=0δη,1δη,112MijJP2+JP,i>0j=0δη,112MijJP2+JP,i=0j>0δη,112MijJP2+JP,i>0j>0MijJP2=JP,i0j0fifjMijJP2=JP,i0j0M^ijJP2\begin{align} \sigma&\propto \sum_{J,\lambda'\lambda} |M^{J}_{\lambda'\lambda}|^2=\sum_{J,\lambda'j=0}|M^{J}_{\lambda'j}|^2+\sum_{J,\lambda'j>0} \left[|M^{J}_{\lambda'j}|^2+|M^{J}_{\lambda'-j}|^2\right]\nonumber\\ &=\sum_{J^P,\lambda'j=0}\delta_{\eta,1}|\frac{1}{2} M^{J^P}_{\lambda'j}|^2+\sum_{J,\lambda'j>0} \left[\frac{1}{4}|M^{J^+}_{\lambda'j}+M^{J^-}_{\lambda'j}|^2+\frac{1}{4}|M^{J^+}_{\lambda'j}-M^{J^-}_{\lambda'j}|^2\right]\nonumber\\ &=\sum_{J^P,i=0j=0}\delta_{\eta,1}\delta_{\eta',1}\frac{1}{2}M^{J^P}_{ij}|^2+\sum_{J^P,i>0j=0}2\delta_{\eta,1}|\frac{1}{2} M^{J^P}_{ij}|^2+\sum_{J^P,\lambda'j>0} \frac{1}{2}|M^{J^P}_{\lambda'j}|^2\nonumber\\ &=\sum_{J^P,i=0j=0}\delta_{\eta,1}\delta_{\eta',1}|\frac{1}{2} M^{J^P}_{ij}|^2 +\sum_{J^P,i>0j=0}\delta_{\eta,1}|\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} M^{J^P}_{ij}|^2 +\sum_{J^P,i=0j>0}\delta_{\eta',1}|\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}M^{J^P}_{ij}|^2 +\sum_{J^P,i>0j>0}|M^{J^P}_{\lambda'j}|^2\nonumber\\ &=\sum_{J^P,i=0j=0}\delta_{\eta,1}\delta_{\eta',1}|\frac{1}{2} M^{J^P}_{ij}|^2 +\sum_{J^P,i>0j=0}\delta_{\eta,1}|\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} M^{J^P}_{ij}|^2 +\sum_{J^P,i=0j>0}\delta_{\eta',1}|\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}M^{J^P}_{ij}|^2 +\sum_{J^P,i>0j>0}|M^{J^P}_{ij}|^2\nonumber\\ &=\sum_{J^P,i\geq0j\geq0}|f_{i}f_{j}M^{J^P}_{ij}|^2=\sum_{J^P,i\geq0j\geq0}|\hat{M}^{J^P}_{ij}|^2 \end{align}

Argand plot

The amplitudes can be written as

M(k)=8πsf(k)=8πskJλR2J+14πDλR,λJ(ϕ,θ,ϕ)aλλJ(k)DλR,λJ(ϕ,θ,ϕ).\begin{align} {\cal M}({\bm k})=-8\pi\sqrt{s}f({\bm k})=-\frac{8\pi\sqrt{s}}{|{\bm k}|}\sum _{J\lambda_R}{\frac{2J+1}{4\pi}}D^{J*}_{\lambda_R,\lambda}(\phi,\theta,-\phi) a^J_{\lambda\lambda'}(|{\bm k}|)D^{J}_{\lambda_R,\lambda'}(\phi',\theta',-\phi'). \end{align}

where aJ=k8πsM(k)a^J=-\frac{|{\bm k}|}{8\pi\sqrt{s}}{\cal M}(|{\bm k}|), which can be displayed as a trajectory in an Argand plot.

Three body decay

kinematics

Lorentz boost

Here, we consider an process Ym1Xm1m2m3Y\to m_1X\to m_1m_2m_3.
To study a 131\to3 decay with the qBSE, we need consider the center of mass frame (CMS) of YY (which is also the laboratory frame in this issue) and the m1m2m_1m_2 where the qBSE is applied. The momenta of initial and final particles in the CMS of YY are

P=(M,0,0,0);  p1=(E1,p1sinθ1,0,p1cosθ1);  p2=(E2,p2);  p3=(E3,p3)\begin{align} P=(M,0,0,0);\ \ p_1=(E_1,{\rm p}_1\sin\theta_1,0,{\rm p}_1\cos\theta_1);\ \ p_2=(E_2,{\bm p}_2);\ \ p_3=(E_3,{\bm p}_3) \end{align}

The momenta of particles 2 and 3 can be written with p3cm{\bm p}^{cm}_3 with Lorentz boost

Lμν(k)=1m(E(k)kxkykzkxm+kxkxE+mkxkyE+mkxkzE+mkykykxE+mm+kykyE+mkykzE+mkzkzkxE+mkzkyE+mm+kzkzE+m),\begin{align} L^{\mu\nu}({\bm k})=\frac{1}{m}\left(\begin{array}{cccc} E({\bm k})&k_x&k_y&k_z\nonumber\\ k_x&m+\frac{k_x k_x}{E+m}&\frac{k_x k_y}{E+m}&\frac{k_x k_z}{E+m}\nonumber\\ k_y&\frac{k_y k_x}{E+m}&m+\frac{k_y k_y}{E+m}&\frac{k_y k_z}{E+m}\nonumber\\ k_z&\frac{k_z k_x}{E+m}&\frac{k_z k_y}{E+m}&m+\frac{k_z k_z}{E+m}\nonumber\\ \end{array}\right), \end{align}

where the (E(k),k)(E({\bm k}), {\bm k}) are the relative momentum between the two reference frames. Without loss of the generality, we write, Ω3cm=(cosθcm,0)\Omega^{cm}_3=(\cos\theta^{cm},0).

With the Lorentz boost the momenta in the laboratory frame can be written with the momenta in the c.m.s of particles 23 as

p2=p3cmp1M23[p1p3cmME1(p1)+M23+E2cm(p3cm)];p3=p3cmp1M23[p1p3cmME1(p1)+M23+E3cm(p3cm)];\begin{align} {\bm p}_2&=-{\bm p}_3^{cm}-\frac{{\bm p}_1}{M_{23}}\left[\frac{{\bm p}_1\cdot {\bm p}_3^{cm}}{M-E_1({\rm p}_1)+M_{23}}+E^{cm}_2({\rm p}_3^{cm})\right];\nonumber\\ {\bm p}_3&={\bm p}_3^{cm}-\frac{{\bm p}_1}{M_{23}}\left[\frac{-{\bm p}_1\cdot {\bm p}_3^{cm}}{M-E_1({\rm p}_1)+M_{23}}+E^{cm}_3({\rm p}_3^{cm})\right]; \end{align}

where the p23+p1=Pp_{23}+p_1=P is applied, and M23=(p2+p3)2=(p2cm+p3cm)2M_{23}=\sqrt{(p_2+p_3)^2}=\sqrt{(p^{cm}_2+p^{cm}_3)^2}. So, p1,2,3p_{1,2,3} can be written with (cosθ1,Ω3cm,M23)(\cos\theta_1,\Omega^{cm}_3,M_{23}).

The momenta in CMS of 2323 can also be written with the momentum in laboratory frame as

Pcm=P+p1M23[p1PME1(p1)+M23+P0]=MM23p1;Pcm0=1M23[(ME1(p1))P0+p1P]=1M23(ME1(p1))Mp1cm=p1+p1M23[p1p1ME1(p1)+M23+p10]=MM23p1;p1cm0=1M23[(ME1(p1))p10+p1p1]=1M23[(ME1(p1))MM232]\begin{align} {\bm P}^{cm}&={\bm P}+\frac{{\bm p}_1}{M_{23}}\left[\frac{{\bm p}_1\cdot {\bm P}}{M-E_1({\bm p}_1)+M_{23}}+P^0\right]=\frac{M}{M_{23}}{\bm p}_1; \nonumber\\ P^{cm0}&=\frac{1}{M_{23}}\left[(M-E_1({\bm p}_1))P^0+{\bm p}_1\cdot{\bm P}\right]=\frac{1}{M_{23}}(M-E_1({\bm p}_1))M\nonumber\\ {\bm p}^{cm}_1&={\bm p}_1+\frac{{\bm p}_1}{M_{23}}\left[\frac{{\bm p}_1\cdot {\bm p}_1}{M-E_1({\bm p}_1)+M_{23}}+p_1^0\right]=\frac{M}{M_{23}}{\bm p}_1; \nonumber\\ p_1^{cm0}&=\frac{1}{M_{23}}\left[(M-E_1({\bm p}_1))p_1^0+{\bm p}_1\cdot{\bm p}_1\right]=\frac{1}{M_{23}}\left[(M-E_1({\bm p}_1))M-M^2_{23}\right] \end{align}

Phase space

The general expression of the decay width is given by

dΓ=12EM2dΦ,dΦ=(2π)4δ4(Pp1p2p3)d3p12E1(2π)3d3p22E2(2π)3d3p32E3(2π)3\begin{align} d\Gamma=\frac{1}{2E}|{\cal M}|^2 d\Phi, \quad d\Phi=(2\pi)^4\delta^4(P-p_1-p_2-p_3) \frac{d^3p_1}{2E_1(2\pi)^3}\frac{d^3p_2}{2E_2(2\pi)^3}\frac{d^3p_3}{2E_3(2\pi)^3} \end{align}

To study the invariant mass spectrum of the particles 2 and 3, it is convenient to rewrite the Lorentz-invariant phase space dΦd\Phi by taking as integration variables the direction of the momentum of particle 2 p2cm{\bm p}_2^{cm} in the center-of-mass (cm) frame of particles 2 and 3. Thus, we first rewrite the phase factor as

dΦ=(2π)4δ4(Pp1p2p3)d3p12E1(2π)3d3p22E2(2π)3d3p32E3(2π)3=(2π)4δ(E2cm+E3cmW23)δ3(p2cm+p3cm)d3p12E1(2π)3d3p2cm2E2cm(2π)3d3p3cm2E3cm(2π)3\begin{align} d\Phi&=(2\pi)^4\delta^4(P-p_1-p_2-p_3) \frac{d^3p_1}{2E_1(2\pi)^3}\frac{d^3p_2}{2E_2(2\pi)^3}\frac{d^3p_3}{2E_3(2\pi)^3}\nonumber\\ &=(2\pi)^4\delta(E^{cm}_2+E^{cm}_3-W_{23})\delta^3({\bm p}^{cm}_2+{\bm p}^{cm}_3) \frac{d^3p_1}{2E_1(2\pi)^3}\frac{d^3p^{cm}_2}{2E_2^{cm}(2\pi)^3}\frac{d^3p^{cm}_3}{2E_3^{cm}(2\pi)^3} \end{align}

where W232=(ME1)2p12W_{23}^2=(M-E_1)^2-|{\rm p}_1|^2. Here the Lorentz invariance of the d3p2E(2π)3\frac{d^3p}{2E(2\pi)^3} and δ4(Pp1p2p3)\delta^4(P-p_1-p_2-p_3) is used.

In this work, we use the momentum of the particle 3 in the center of mass system of two rescattering particles. The momentum of the particle 3 has a relation p3cm=12M23λ(M232,m32,m22){\rm p}^{cm}_3=\frac{1}{2M_{23}}\sqrt{\lambda(M_{23}^2,m_3^2,m_2^2)} with M23=(p2+p3)2=(p2cm+p3cm)2M_{23}=\sqrt{(p_2+p_3)^2}=\sqrt{(p^{cm}_2+p^{cm}_3)^2}.

Owing to the three-momentum δ\delta function, the integral over p2cm{\bm p}^{cm}_2 can be eliminated. Next, the quantity d3p3cmd^3p^{cm}_3 is converted to dM23dM_{23} by the relation,

d3p3cm=E2cmE3cmp3cmM23dM23dΩ3cm,\begin{align} d^3p^{cm}_3=\frac{E^{cm}_2E^{cm}_3{\rm p}^{cm}_3}{M_{23}}dM_{23}d\Omega^{cm}_3, \end{align}

where M23M_{23}(=E2cm+E3cm=E^{cm}_2+E^{cm}_3) is the invariant mass of the 2323 system. We would like to integrate over the magnitude of the neutron momentum p1p_1, which is related to W23W_{23}. Hence, the energy-conserving δ\delta function is substituted as,

δ(M23W23)=W23Mp1/E1δ(p˘1p1)\begin{align} \delta(M_{23}-W_{23})=\frac{W_{23}}{|M{\rm p}_1/E_1|}\delta(\breve{\rm p}_1-{\rm p}_1) \end{align}

where the p˘1\breve{\rm p}_1 satisfies M232=(ME˘1)2p˘12M_{23}^2=(M-\breve{E}_1)^2-\breve{\rm p}_1^2.

Performing the integral over p1{\rm p}_1, we obtain the final expression of the decay width,

dΦ=1(2π)5p˘1p3cm8MdΩ1dΩ3cmdM23=1(2π)3p˘1p3cm8Mdcosθ1dcosθ3cmdM23,\begin{align} d\Phi &=\frac{1}{(2\pi)^5}\frac{\breve{\rm p}_1{\rm p}^{cm}_3}{8M}d\Omega_1d\Omega^{cm}_3dM_{23} =\frac{1}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{\breve{\rm p}_1{\rm p}^{cm}_3}{8M}d\cos\theta_1d\cos\theta^{cm}_3dM_{23}, \end{align}

Here, independence of the ϕ1\phi_1 and ϕ2cm\phi^{cm}_2 on the integrand is applied.

Amplitude

Because the amplitude is covariant, the amplitude for the direct decay can be written as (we omit the helicity of particle 1, which is scalar meson)

Mλ2,λ3;λd(p1,p2,p3)=Aλ2,λ3;λ(p1,p2,p3)=Aλ2,λ3;λ(p1cm,p2cm,p3cm)=JλRNJDλR,λ32J(Ω3cm)Aλ2,λ3;λJ(cosθ1,M23)Mλ2,λ3;λZ(p1,p2,p3)=d4p3(2π)4Tλ2,λ3(p2,p3;p2,p3)G(p3)Aλ(p1,p2,p3)=d4p3cm(2π)4Tλ2,λ3(p2cm,p3cm;p2cm,p3cm)G(p3cm)Aλ(p1cm,p2cm,p3cm)=λ2λ3d3p3cm(2π)3iTλ2,λ3;λ2,λ3(Ω3cm,p3cm,M23)G0(p3cm)Aλ2,λ3;λ(p1cm,p2cm,p3cm)=JλRDλR,λ32J(Ω3cm)λ2λ3p3cm2dp3cmdΩ3cm(2π)3NJ2iTλ2,λ3;λ2,λ3J(p3cm,M23)DλR,λ32J(Ω3cm)G0(p3cm)  JλRNJDλR,λ32J(Ω3cm)Aλ2,λ3;λJ(cosθ1,p3cm,M23)=JλRNJDλR,λ32J(Ω3cm)λ2λ3p3cm2dp3cm(2π)3iTλ2,λ3;λ2,λ3J(p3cm,M23)G0(p3cm)Aλ2,λ3;λJ(cosθ1,p3cm,M23)Mλ2,λ3;λZ(Ω3cm,cosθ1,M23)M~λ1,λ3;λZ(p1,p2,p3)=JλRNJDλR,λ31J(Ω~3cm)λ1λ3p~3cm2dp~3cm(2π)3iTλ1,λ3;λ1,λ3J(p~3cm,M13)G0(p~3cm)Aλ1,λ3;λJ(cosθ2,p~3cm,M13)M~λ2,λ3;λZ(Ω~3cm,cosθ2,M13)\begin{align} {\cal M}^{d}_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda}(p_1,p_2,p_3)&={\cal A}_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda}(p_1,p_2,p_3)={\cal A}_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda}(p^{cm}_1,p^{cm}_2,p^{cm}_3)\nonumber\\ % &=\sum_{J\lambda_R}N_JD^{J*}_{\lambda_R,\lambda_{32}}( \Omega_3^{cm}){\cal A}^J_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda}(\cos\theta_1,M_{23})\nonumber\\ % % {\cal M}^{Z}_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda}(p_1,p_2,p_3)&=\int \frac{d^4p'_3}{(2\pi)^4} {\cal T}_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3}(p_2,p_3;p'_2,p'_3) G(p'_3){\cal A}_\lambda(p_1,p'_2,p'_3)\nonumber\\ % &=\int \frac{d^4p'^{cm}_3}{(2\pi)^4} {\cal T}_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3}(p^{cm}_2,p^{cm}_3;p'^{cm}_2,p'^{cm}_3) G(p'^{cm}_3){\cal A}_\lambda(p^{cm}_1,p'^{cm}_2,p'^{cm}_3)\nonumber\\ % &=\sum_{\lambda'_2\lambda'_3}\int \frac{d^3p'^{cm}_3}{(2\pi)^3} i{\cal T}_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda'_2,\lambda'_3}(\Omega_3^{cm},{\rm p}'^{cm}_3,M_{23}) G_0({\rm p}'^{cm}_3){\cal A}_{\lambda'_2,\lambda'_3;\lambda}(p^{cm}_1,p'^{cm}_2,p'^{cm}_3)\nonumber\\ % &=\sum_{J\lambda_R}D^{J*}_{\lambda_R,\lambda_{32}}( \Omega_3^{cm})\sum_{\lambda'_2\lambda'_3}\int \frac{{\rm p}'^{cm2}_3d{\rm p}'^{cm}_3d\Omega'^{cm}_3}{(2\pi)^3} N_J^2i{\cal T}^J_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda'_2,\lambda'_3}({\rm p}'^{cm}_3,M_{23})D^{J}_{\lambda_R,\lambda'_{32}}(\Omega'^{cm}_3) G_0({\rm p}'^{cm}_3)\nonumber\\ &\ \cdot\ \sum_{J'\lambda'_R}N_{J'}D^{J'*}_{\lambda'_R,\lambda'_{32}}( \Omega'^{cm}_3){\cal A}^{J'}_{\lambda'_2,\lambda'_3;\lambda}(\cos\theta_1,{\rm p}'^{cm}_3,M_{23})\nonumber\\ % &=\sum_{J\lambda_R}N_{J}D^{J*}_{\lambda_R,\lambda_{32}}( \Omega_3^{cm})\sum_{\lambda'_2\lambda'_3}\int \frac{{\rm p}'^{cm2}_3d{\rm p}'^{cm}_3}{(2\pi)^3} i{\cal T}^J_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda'_2,\lambda'_3}({\rm p}'^{cm}_3,M_{23}) G_0({\rm p}'^{cm}_3) {\cal A}^{J}_{\lambda'_2,\lambda'_3;\lambda}(\cos\theta_1,{\rm p}'^{cm}_3,M_{23})\nonumber\\ &\equiv{\cal M}^{Z}_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda}({\Omega}_3^{cm},\cos\theta_1,M_{23})\nonumber\\ % % \tilde{\cal M}^{Z}_{\lambda_1,\lambda_3;\lambda}(p_1,p_2,p_3)% &=\sum_{J\lambda_R}N_{J}D^{J*}_{\lambda_R,\lambda_{31}}( \tilde{\Omega}_3^{cm})\sum_{\lambda'_1\lambda'_3}\int \frac{\tilde{\rm p}'^{cm2}_3d\tilde{\rm p}'^{cm}_3}{(2\pi)^3} i{\cal T}^J_{\lambda_1,\lambda_3;\lambda'_1,\lambda'_3}(\tilde{\rm p}'^{cm}_3,M_{13}) G_0(\tilde{\rm p}'^{cm}_3) {\cal A}^{J}_{\lambda'_1,\lambda'_3;\lambda}(\cos\theta_2,\tilde{\rm p}'^{cm}_3,M_{13})\nonumber\\ &\equiv\tilde{\cal M}^{Z}_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda}(\tilde{\Omega}_3^{cm},\cos\theta_2,M_{13}) \end{align}

where TJ=(TJ+TJ+)/2{\cal T}^{J}=({\cal T}^{J^-}+{\cal T}^{J^+})/2 and NJ=2J+14πN_J=\sqrt{\frac{2J+1}{4\pi}}.

Decay width

The distribution can be obtained as

dΓdM23=16Mλ2,λ3;λMλ2,λ3;λ21(2π)5p˘1p3cm8MdΩ1dΩ3cm\begin{align} {d\Gamma\over dM_{23}}&=\int \frac{1}{6M}\sum_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda}|{\cal M}_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda}|^2 \frac{1}{(2\pi)^5}\frac{\breve{\rm p}_1{\rm p}^{cm}_3}{8M}d\Omega_1d\Omega^{cm}_3 \end{align}

If the reflection effect is absent, for example, the πDD\pi DD^* final state. The results can be simplified further. The amplitude can be written as

Mλ2,λ3;λ(p1,p2,p3)=JλRNJ2DλR,λ32J(Ω3cm)DλRλJ(Ω1)[A^λ2,λ3;λd,J(M23)+λ2λ3p3cm2(2π)3Tλ2,λ3;λ2,λ3DD0,J(p3cm,M23)G0DD0(p3cm)A^λ2,λ3;λDD0,J(p3cm,M23)+λ2λ3p3cm2(2π)3Tλ2,λ3;λ2,λ3DD0,J(p3cm,M23)G0DD0(p3cm)A^λ2,λ3;λDD0,J(p3cm,M23)]JλRNJ2DλR,λ23J(Ω3cm)DλRλJ(Ω1)M^λ2,λ3;λJ(M23)\begin{align} {\cal M}_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda}(p_1,p_2,p_3) &=\sum_{J\lambda_R}N_J^2D^{J*}_{\lambda_R,\lambda_{32}}( \Omega_3^{cm})D^J_{\lambda_R\lambda}(\Omega_1)\left[\hat{\cal A}^{d,J}_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda}(M_{23})\right.\nonumber\\ % &+\sum_{\lambda'_2\lambda'_3}\int \frac{{\rm p}'^{cm2}_3}{(2\pi)^3} {\cal T}^{{D^-D^{*0}},J}_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda'_2,\lambda'_3}({\rm p}'^{cm}_3,M_{23}) G^{D^-D^{*0}}_0({\rm p}'^{cm}_3) \hat{\cal A}^{{D^-D^{*0}},J}_{\lambda'_2,\lambda'_3;\lambda}({\rm p}'^{cm}_3,M_{23})\nonumber\\ % &\left.+\sum_{\lambda'_2\lambda'_3}\int \frac{{\rm p}'^{cm2}_3}{(2\pi)^3} {\cal T}^{{D^{*-}D^{0}},J}_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda'_2,\lambda'_3}({\rm p}'^{cm}_3,M_{23}) G^{D^{*-}D^{0}}_0({\rm p}'^{cm}_3) \hat{\cal A}^{{D^{*-}D^{0}},J}_{\lambda'_2,\lambda'_3;\lambda}({\rm p}'^{cm}_3,M_{23})\right]\nonumber\\ &\equiv \sum_{J\lambda_R}N^2_JD^{J*}_{\lambda_R,\lambda_{23}}( \Omega_3^{cm})D^J_{\lambda_R\lambda}(\Omega_1)\hat{\cal M}^J_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda}(M_{23}) \end{align}

Inserting the above amplitude to the definition of the invariant mass spectrum, we have

dΓdM23=16M1(2π)5p˘1p3cm8Mλ2,λ3;λJλRNJ2DλR,λ32J(Ω3cm)DλRλJ(Ω1)M^λ2,λ3;λJ(M23)2dΩ1dΩ3cm=16M1(2π)5p˘1p3cm8Mλ2,λ3;λ;JM^λ2,λ3;λJ(M23)2\begin{align} {d\Gamma\over dM_{23}} &=\frac{1}{6M}\frac{1}{(2\pi)^5}\frac{\breve{\rm p}_1{\rm p}^{cm}_3}{8M}\sum_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda}\int|\sum_{J\lambda_R}N^2_JD^{J*}_{\lambda_R,\lambda_{32}}( \Omega_3^{cm})D^J_{\lambda_R\lambda}(\Omega_1)\hat{\cal M}^J_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda}(M_{23})|^2 d\Omega_1d\Omega^{cm}_3\nonumber\\ &=\frac{1}{6M}\frac{1}{(2\pi)^5}\frac{\breve{\rm p}_1{\rm p}^{cm}_3}{8M}\sum_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda;J}|\hat{\cal M}^J_{\lambda_2,\lambda_3;\lambda}(M_{23})|^2 \nonumber\\ \end{align}

Now we consider the amplitude with fixed parity,

Mλ23;λJ=Aλ23;λd,J+Tλ23,λ23JG0Aλ23;λJ,ηMλ23;λJ=ηAλ23;λd,J+ηTλ23,λ23JG0Aλ23;λJMλ23;λJP=Aλ23;λd,JP+Tλ23,λ23JPG0Aλ23;λJ=Aλ23;λd,JP+ηTλ23,λ23JPG0Aλ23;λJ=Aλ23;λd,JP+\halfTλ23,λ23JPG0Aλ23;λJP\begin{align} {\cal M}^{J}_{\lambda_{23};\lambda}&={\cal A}^{d,J}_{\lambda_{23};\lambda}+{\cal T}^{J}_{\lambda_{23},\lambda'_{23}}G_0{\cal A}^J_{\lambda'_{23};\lambda},\quad \eta{\cal M}^{J}_{-\lambda_{23};\lambda}=\eta{\cal A}^{d,J}_{-\lambda_{23};\lambda}+\eta{\cal T}^{J}_{-\lambda_{23},\lambda'_{23}}G_0{\cal A}^J_{\lambda'_{23};\lambda}\nonumber\\ \Rightarrow {\cal M}^{J^P}_{\lambda_{23};\lambda}&={\cal A}^{d,J^P}_{\lambda_{23};\lambda}+{\cal T}^{J^P}_{\lambda_{23},\lambda'_{23}}G_0{\cal A}^{J}_{\lambda'_{23} ;\lambda}={\cal A}^{d,J^P}_{\lambda_{23};\lambda}+\eta'{\cal T}^{J^P}_{\lambda_{23},\lambda'_{23}}G_0{\cal A}^{J}_{-\lambda'_{23} ;\lambda}={\cal A}^{d,J^P}_{\lambda_{23};\lambda}+\half{\cal T}^{J^P}_{\lambda_{23},\lambda'_{23}}G_0{\cal A}^{J^P}_{\lambda'_{23} ;\lambda} \end{align}

Here Mλ23;λJP=Mλ23;λJ+ηMλ23;λJ{\cal M}^{J^P}_{\lambda_{23};\lambda}={\cal M}^{J}_{\lambda_{23};\lambda}+\eta{\cal M}^{J}_{\lambda_{23};\lambda}, Aλ23;λd,JP=Aλ23;λd,J+ηAλ23;λd,J{\cal A}^{d,J^P}_{\lambda_{23};\lambda}={\cal A}^{d,J}_{\lambda_{23};\lambda}+\eta{\cal A}^{d,J}_{\lambda_{23};\lambda}, Tλ23,λ23JP=Tλ23,λ23J+ηTλ23,λ23J=Tλ23,λ23J+ηTλ23,λ23J{\cal T}^{J^P}_{\lambda_{23},\lambda'_{23}}={\cal T}^{J}_{\lambda_{23},\lambda'_{23}}+\eta{\cal T}^{J}_{-\lambda_{23},\lambda'_{23}}={\cal T}^{J}_{\lambda_{23},\lambda'_{23}}+\eta'{\cal T}^{J}_{\lambda_{23},-\lambda'_{23}}. NOTE: For parity conserving interaction, we have TλλJ=η(η)1Tλλ{\cal T}^J_{\lambda'\lambda}=\eta(\eta')^{-1}{\cal T}_{-\lambda'\lambda}, which can be checked in the code by different definitions of TJP{\cal T}^{J^P}.

We summarize the results as following,

dΓdM23=16M1(2π)5p˘1p3cm8Mi0;j0;JP1NJ2M^i;jJP(M23)2,M^i;iJP(M23)=A^j;id,JP(M23)+kdp3cmp3cm2(2π)3T^j;kJP(p3cm,M23)G0(p3cm)A^k;iJP(p3cm,M23),\begin{align} {d\Gamma\over dM_{23}}&=\frac{1}{6M}\frac{1}{(2\pi)^5}\frac{\breve{\rm p}_1{\rm p}^{cm}_3}{8M}\sum_{i\ge0;j\ge0;J^P}\frac{1}{N_J^2}|\hat{\cal M}^{J^P}_{i;j}(M_{23})|^2, \nonumber\\ \hat{\cal M}^{J^P}_{i;i}(M_{23}) &=\hat{\cal A}^{d,J^P}_{j;i}(M_{23})+\sum_{k}\int \frac{d{\rm p}'^{cm}_3{\rm p}'^{cm2}_3}{(2\pi)^3}\hat{\cal T}^{J^P}_{j;k}({\rm p}'^{cm}_3,M_{23}) G_0({\rm p}'^{cm}_3) \hat{\cal A}^{J^P}_{k;i}({\rm p}'^{cm}_3,M_{23}), \end{align}

where ii and jj denote the independent λ2,3\lambda_{2,3} and λ\lambda, and the factors fi=0=1/2f_{i=0}=1/\sqrt{2} and fi0=1f_{i\neq0}=1 are inserted, which is the same as in Eq.~(\ref{Eq:qBSEP}). The above equation can be abbreviated as M=Ad+TGA M={A}^{d}+{T}G { A}, where TT is solved by the Bethe-Salpeter equation T=V+VGTT=V+VGT. NOTE: The amplitudes obtained by equation T=V+TGVT=V+TGV is the same, which can be checked by the code.